1.
I
think the scientists faced similar moral problems. In “Fat Man and Little Boy”,
the scientists weren’t just building a bomb to end a war. Most of them where
aware that they were developing technology that could end the world. Oppenheimer knew that there was other use for
the technology besides building bombs, and I believe that is why he ultimately
decided to finish the project. In “Godzilla”, Serizawa faced similar problems. Like
the developers of the atomic bomb, he wasn’t entirely certain as to how much
damage his weapon would cause. He was also concerned with the political
ramifications of his invention.
2.
I
think they waited to show Godzilla in America because it was mocking our
development of nuclear weapons. In a sense, Godzilla is like an allegory to the
Manhattan project, just like “Animal Farm” is to the Russian Resolution and the
Stalin era. Godzilla attacks Japan (like Japan attacks Pearl Harbor), and a
scientist believes he can destroy the threat, but the weapon may have more
negative ramifications than positive ones. In both cases, the scientists deploy
their weapons, and have to deal with the aftermath. I think the moral of the
first Godzilla movie is that we (The United States), had no right to use such a
weapon on Japan, because there were other ways of resolving the problem.
3.
My
opinion on nuclear weapons hasn’t really changed after watching either of these
films. I believe the bombs have uses that can be productive in certain
situations. For example; if we ever have to destroy a meteor headed for earth,
or destroy an extra-terrestrial species threating out planet, powerful nuclear weapons
are the only chance we stand against those kinds of threats. I also believe nuclear power is one of the
better solutions to the energy crisis, if we can find a way to safely dispose
of the waste. Basically, I think it was only a matter of time before someone,
somewhere discovered the potential of nuclear power, and I’m glad that we were
the first ones to do it.
4. The science of the Godzilla monster is
utterly ridiculous. It is suppose to be 100 m tall
and between 20,000 and 60,000 tons (depending on which film you watch). Nothing
that big could stand under its own weight, let alone walk around terrorizing a city. The biggest
dinosaur to ever live was the Argentinosaurus,
which only weighed 100 tons. When talking about a biological organism that
size, you also have to think about things like blood pressure and circulation. His
heart would have to be an enormous diesel engine to maintain blood flow to all
of his limbs. So just based on those few fundamental issues, nothing like that
could ever exist.
5. The name
“Oxygen Destroyer” is kind of a paradox because neither matter, nor energy can
be created or destroyed. It can however be transformed. For the oxygen
destroyer to actually exist and operate, it would have to take oxygen and
convert it to some other, really bad substance to be affective as a weapon. Even
nuclear weapons don’t just create energy from nothing. They convert mass from a
reaction (or several reactions) to enormous amounts of energy.
There's nothing wrong with your responses, though they don't demonstrate much insight or deep thought. I was hoping for something more.
ReplyDelete