This week we
watched Armageddon, which is a fantastic film despite the horribly inaccurate physics
portrayed in the movie. NASA’s plan for saving the earth was flawed in several
ways. If we ignore the fact that people could actually land a shuttle on the surface
of an asteroid and then drill down into it and plant a nuclear weapon, then
there is still one huge remaining flaw. Given the size of the asteroid, one
nuclear weapon would not even come close to doing what it is shown to do in the
movie. Even the largest nuclear weapon ever thought of (not even successfully
built) would only split the asteroid and move each piece a few hundred meters
in either direction before both smash into the surface of the earth.
My new plan is
based off NASA’s plan from the movie, but with a few changes. I would still
send astronauts up to the asteroid but instead they would drop 5 Tsar bombs and
blow up the asteroid 4 hours after it passed the moon. Then I would send a
second and third team, each to land on the surface of the individual pieces of
asteroid, and on the surface, detonate more bombs after another 4 hours,
causing the pieces to accelerate in the y-axis and allow them to cover enough
distance in the y-axis in the remaining 2 hours of time before they smash into
the earth.
In doing the
calculations to figure out how much explosive power would be needed to propel
each half fast enough to clear the earth in the remaining 2 hours, I realized
the amount of force needed would be light-years beyond anything mankind is capable
of generating with the technology we have today. I determined it would take the
equivalent of 5.18x10^11 megatons of TNT, per piece. That would be more than
5.18 Billion Tsar bombs per half of asteroid.
In other words, you still failed to save us? Unless, that is, you actually believe there is 1 Tsar bomb per person in the world. Seems a bit like overkill; Apple hasn't even managed to manufacture that many iPhones yet. Got any other bright ideas?
ReplyDelete